Showing posts with label Fair. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fair. Show all posts

Friday, 10 November 2017

Interesting article from the Guardian !!




,095

It’s not enough to say, in response to the Paradise Papers revelations, that we already knew that rich people parked their money in offshore tax havens, where their piles accumulate far from the scrutiny of our government. Nor is it enough to say that we were already aware that we live in a time of “inequality.”
What we have learned this week is the clinical definition of the word. What we have learned is how much the rich and the virtuous have been hiding away and where they’re hiding it. Yes, there are sinister-looking Russian capitalists involved. But there’s also our favorite actors and singers. Our beloved alma mater, supposedly a charitable institution. Everyone with money seems to be in on it.

We’re also learning that maybe we’ve had it backwards all along. Tax havens on some tropical island aren’t some sideshow to western capitalism; they are a central reality. Those hidden billions are like an unseen planet whose gravity is pulling our politics and our economy always in a certain direction. And this week we finally began to understand what that uncharted planet looks like; we started to grasp its mass and its power.
Think about it like this. For decades Americans have been erupting in anger at what they can see happening to their beloved middle-class world. We think we know what the culprit is; we can see it vaguely through a darkened glass. It’s “elitism”. It’s a “rigged system”. It’s people who think they’re better than us. And for decades we have lashed out. At the immigrant next door. At Jews. At Muslims. At school teachers. At public workers who are still paid a decent wage. Our fury, unrelenting, grows and grows.

We revolt, but it turns out we have chosen the wrong political leader. We revolt again; this time, the leader is even worse.

This week we are coming face to face with a big part of the right answer: it’s that the celebrities and business leaders we have raised up above ourselves would like to have nothing to do with us. Yes, they are grateful for the protection of our laws. Yes, they like having the police and the marine corps on hand to defend their property.

Yes, they eat our food and breathe our air and expect us to keep these pure and healthy; they demand that we get educated before we may come and work for them, and for that purpose they expect us to pay for a vast system of public schools. They also expect us to watch their movies, to buy their products, to use their software. They expect our (slowly declining) middle class to be their loyal customers.
But those celebrities and business types would prefer not to do what it takes to support all this. That burden’s on us. Oh, they’re happy to haul billions out of our economy and use us up in the workplace, but maintaining the machinery that keeps it all running – that’s on us.

I don’t want to go too far here. I know that what the billionaires and the celebrities have done is legal. They merely took advantage of the system. It’s the system itself, and the way it was deliberately constructed to achieve these awful ends, that should be the target of our fury.

For decades Americans have lashed out against taxation because they were told that cutting taxes would give people an incentive to work harder and thus make the American economy flourish. Our populist leaders told us this – they’re telling us this still, as they reform taxes in Washington – and they rolled back the income tax, they crusaded against the estate tax, and they worked to keep our government from taking action against offshore tax havens.

In reality, though, it was never about us and our economy at all. Today it is obvious that all of this had only one rationale: to raise up a class of supermen above us. It had nothing to do with jobs or growth. Or freedom either. The only person’s freedom to be enhanced by these tax havens was the billionaire’s freedom. It was all to make his life even better, not ours.

Think, for a moment, of how this country has been starved so the holders of these offshore accounts might enjoy their private jets in peace. Think of what we might have done with the sums we have lost to these tax strategies over the decades. All the crumbling infrastructure that politicians love to complain about: it should have – and could have - been fixed long ago.

Think of all the young people saddled with catastrophic student-loan debt: we should have – could have – made that unnecessary. Think of all the decayed small towns, and the dying rust belt cities, and the drug-addicted hopeless: all of them should have – could have – been helped.

But no. Instead America chose a different project. Our leaders raised up a tiny class of otherworldly individuals and built a paradise for them, made their lives supremely delicious. Today they hold unimaginable and unaccountable power.

We endure potholes and live in fear of collapsing highway bridges because our leaders wanted these very special people to have an even larger second yacht. Our kids sit in overcrowded classrooms in underfunded schools so that a handful of exalted individuals can relax on their own private beach.

Today it is these same golden figures with their offshore billions who host the fundraisers, hire the lobbyists, bankroll the think tanks and subsidize the artists and intellectuals.

This is their democracy today. We just happen to live in it.
  • Thomas Frank is a Guardian columnist

Wednesday, 30 March 2016

OOOOOPS.....SOMETHING THAT MAKES SENSE!!!

(from the Automatic Earth).....

“..basic income could remove the need for a welfare state that is patronising and humiliating..”
There are ideas that refuse to die no matter how many times they are rejected. One such idea is Universal Basic Income. Basic income is the proposal to pay all citizens an unconditional regular amount sufficient for basic needs, and then leave them to seek their fortune as best they can in the market. Few trials have been held and those have not led to large-scale adoption, but the proposal keeps recurring in social policy debates. That is largely because it is an excellent idea. In the past century the attraction for thinkers on the left and the right has been that basic income could remove the need for a welfare state that is patronising and humiliating, creates perverse incentives against working, and whose complexity means it often fails to reach those truly in need of help while subsidising the middle class.
Today, with deepening anxiety that we will all be put out of work (or, alternatively, be enslaved) by robots, the appeal of basic income has returned to its roots. More than 200 years ago, Thomas Paine advocated it as a way to fairly distribute the “ground rent” generated by concentrated landholdings to the landless — the idea being that the earth was humanity’s common property. If technological change today means markets tilt the distribution of income towards capital owners and away from workers, a similar argument can be made for the redistribution of “rent” due to humanity’s technological ingenuity equally among every citizen.

Saturday, 13 February 2016

Real Tax Reform - Fabulously simple - and fair!!!



OK.....I'm going to repost this from last year because Tax Reform is in the air in many countries, and we need to put forward REAL suggestions - ones that don't lend themselves to corruption, manipulation - and benefiting a wealthy minority. Goodbye Corporatocracy.....goodbye Banksters :)

Imagine being able to partially/completely disband the ATO or the IRS.....wow !!!

If this sounds good to you, then please make this known to all and sundry.

Thank you for doing your part!


Real Tax Reform

By Michelle Lopert 

It’s the 21st Century and we’re still paying Income Tax. This archaic system was devised back in the Industrial Revolution. Today, with the advent of computers, there are simpler, better, and more equitable ways to collect taxes.

Most governments are continually looking for new sources of tax revenue that are not politically suicidal. Obviously, the money raised through income tax isn’t enough so we now have GST, payroll tax, property rates, fuel excise, stamp duty, capital gains tax, land tax, company tax and more. Ironically, the wealthier you are, or the bigger your corporation, the more chance you have of avoiding tax through tax havens, Swiss bank accounts and creative accountancy.

A viable alternative to all these ridiculous complex taxes is to replace them with one tax - the DEBIT TAX. The National Debit Tax is the most efficient system of taxation ever devised. And it’s not new. The Debit Tax has been working successfully in Norfolk Island where there is no income tax.

Here’s how it works. Every hour of the day, money is withdrawn from savings accounts, cheque accounts, insurance companies, business and investment organisations, and financial institutions of all kinds.

Whenever a person, financial institution, or company withdraws money by cash, cheque or electronically, a 1% tax is automatically debited. That 1% is then electronically transferred to the Australian Federal Treasury.

The tax is collected electronically and continuously – not quarterly or annually – and without paperwork of any kind. You don’t have to do a thing.

Let’s say you have an annual salary of $30,000. With today’s cumbersome system, if you add up all the taxes including income tax, GST, house rates, fuel excise and other hidden taxes, you’ll be paying about $15,000 tax. Under the debit tax system, you would only pay $300.

On a national level, a 1% debit tax would provide Australia with a tax revenue of approx $470 billion annually. The current system only provides approx $215 billion.

It’s hard to believe that a tiny 1% national debit tax could replace all other taxes at the Federal, State and Local Government levels.

Unlike all other taxation systems, the National Debit Tax does not require you or any business or organization to give an account of transactions to the Government. Big brother will not be watching because it’s not necessary.

Tax collection becomes the function of a programmed computer linked to the banking system under the control of the Treasury Department.

Individuals, businesses, and corporations will no longer be required to be self tax collectors as they are today. This eliminates potential sources of injustice, corruption and tax evasion. Why would a company bother hiding money in tax havens that charge 2 or 3% when the Debit Tax is only 1%?

Imagine, we could eliminate the bureaucratic nightmare known as the Taxation Department, emancipating the thousands of glassy-eyed administrative slaves who sweat over mountains of income tax forms, deciphering a million petty laws.

The debit tax would erode the cash economy. With Big Brother not watching, who is going to risk keeping millions under the mattress in order to avoid a piddling amount of tax?

Likewise, the debit tax would see the demise of destabilising currency speculation. The debit tax would eat away the profits of speculators who move massive amounts of money around the globe in a bid to cash in on small currency fluctuations.

What company would complain about a 1% debit tax when it means not having to pay 3.75 % payroll tax?

After the Global Financial Crisis, leaders of Europe's three biggest economies, Germany, France and Britain, were promoting the Debit Tax as a way to fulfil commitments to domestic budgets, climate change and international development. Regrettably, our federal Treasurer, Wayne Swan, did not support the tax at the G20 finance meeting in 2009 possibly because Australia came through the global financial crisis relatively unscathed. But how will we fare in future crises?

They say the only certain things in life are Death and Taxes. The tedious Tax Pack booklet may be a great cure for insomnia but let’s make it a relic. Let’s push for proper tax reform and stop fiddling at the edges while Australia burns...or, should I say, floods.

 (Reprinted with permission - Thank you, Michelle!).

Sunday, 15 November 2015

MEET THE STREET




MEET THE STREET

Years ago when I lived in Melbourne, I was in a villa unit in a group of 10.

One day I was meeting a State Manager of a large firm with a view to taking on a distributorship for his company. I drove clear across Melbourne to see him.

During our discussion, he asked where I lived, so I told him. He looked interested, and asked in what street, so I told him. He looked askance at me and asked what number?

Yes, you guessed it – we lived in the same complex!!!

Of course, from that day on I saw him in the yard continually !!


The point I am making is that usually city dwellers insulate themselves and do their best to maintain a space around them. Natural under the circumstances of living with large numbers of people in close proximity. Rural dwellers are usually more used to co-operative living and sharing resources.

However, as I have said before, in times of trouble our best resource is our local community.
We can watch out for each other, keep an eye on each others places, share produce, share labour, share tools & equipment, babysit etc etc etc.

Problem is, once a calamity has occurred, it is more difficult to get to know people, as one has a wall of suspicion to scale.

Far better to have made some moves BEFORE the calamity strikes.


So let me introduce you to what I call “MEET THE STREET”.
It’s time to make a conscious effort to get to know everyone around you.
Initially –to get the ball rolling smoothly – you might consider doing “fun” things, like organizing a street party, and progress on to other community activities like a combined garage sale, or fair.

Such activity can then easily lead to a very local barter economy, which can then be extended as other streets do the same thing. This then gives bigger resources and a greater pool of labour, assistance and skills.


The time to start is now, folks !! Good luck with it - and remember, it's not the outcome that we ought to focus on - but rather enjoying the journey as best we can.



Thursday, 15 October 2015

What would a new economic system look like??



A headline yesterday that says it all…..Global inequality is growing, with half the world’s wealth in the hands of just 1% of the world’s population, according to a new report (Guardian)

Once we have the BIG crash happening, and we have yet again lost our faith in a fiat currency,....what then?

In fact, do we even still need to use money?

To take a leaf from the TV show Star Trek – The Next Generation….. in their future world they no longer use or need money, as no medium of exchange is required.

Rather, everyone does what they love to do – whatever their passion is. If you want to grow food for people – fine! If you want to study – fine.
And if we are doing what moves us, then no-one gets bored!

Perhaps I could propose something here. There is one thing that we all have, we simply don’t know how much!

Time.

In other words, an hour of my life is equally as precious as an hour of yours. Whether, you are a brain surgeon, labourer or computer specialist – an hour of each of our lives carries the same value.

No inflation, no asset bubbles, no hoarding, no fuss.

No investors, shareholders or financial consultants.

And more importantly – no bankers.

A level playing field.

Finally.

Any thoughts on how we can make that work – and work well??





Monday, 12 October 2015

Real Tax Reform - Fabulously simple - and fair!!!


Real Tax Reform

By Michelle Lopert 

It’s the 21st Century and we’re still paying Income Tax. This archaic system was devised back in the Industrial Revolution. Today, with the advent of computers, there are simpler, better, and more equitable ways to collect taxes.

Most governments are continually looking for new sources of tax revenue that are not politically suicidal. Obviously, the money raised through income tax isn’t enough so we now have GST, payroll tax, property rates, fuel excise, stamp duty, capital gains tax, land tax, company tax and more. Ironically, the wealthier you are, or the bigger your corporation, the more chance you have of avoiding tax through tax havens, Swiss bank accounts and creative accountancy.

A viable alternative to all these ridiculous complex taxes is to replace them with one tax - the DEBIT TAX. The National Debit Tax is the most efficient system of taxation ever devised. And it’s not new. The Debit Tax has been working successfully in Norfolk Island where there is no income tax.

Here’s how it works. Every hour of the day, money is withdrawn from savings accounts, cheque accounts, insurance companies, business and investment organisations, and financial institutions of all kinds.

Whenever a person, financial institution, or company withdraws money by cash, cheque or electronically, a 1% tax is automatically debited. That 1% is then electronically transferred to the Australian Federal Treasury.

The tax is collected electronically and continuously – not quarterly or annually – and without paperwork of any kind. You don’t have to do a thing.

Let’s say you have an annual salary of $30,000. With today’s cumbersome system, if you add up all the taxes including income tax, GST, house rates, fuel excise and other hidden taxes, you’ll be paying about $15,000 tax. Under the debit tax system, you would only pay $300.

On a national level, a 1% debit tax would provide Australia with a tax revenue of approx $470 billion annually. The current system only provides approx $215 billion.

It’s hard to believe that a tiny 1% national debit tax could replace all other taxes at the Federal, State and Local Government levels.

Unlike all other taxation systems, the National Debit Tax does not require you or any business or organization to give an account of transactions to the Government. Big brother will not be watching because it’s not necessary.

Tax collection becomes the function of a programmed computer linked to the banking system under the control of the Treasury Department.

Individuals, businesses, and corporations will no longer be required to be self tax collectors as they are today. This eliminates potential sources of injustice, corruption and tax evasion. Why would a company bother hiding money in tax havens that charge 2 or 3% when the Debit Tax is only 1%?

Imagine, we could eliminate the bureaucratic nightmare known as the Taxation Department, emancipating the thousands of glassy-eyed administrative slaves who sweat over mountains of income tax forms, deciphering a million petty laws.

The debit tax would erode the cash economy. With Big Brother not watching, who is going to risk keeping millions under the mattress in order to avoid a piddling amount of tax?

Likewise, the debit tax would see the demise of destabilising currency speculation. The debit tax would eat away the profits of speculators who move massive amounts of money around the globe in a bid to cash in on small currency fluctuations.

What company would complain about a 1% debit tax when it means not having to pay 3.75 % payroll tax?

After the Global Financial Crisis, leaders of Europe's three biggest economies, Germany, France and Britain, were promoting the Debit Tax as a way to fulfil commitments to domestic budgets, climate change and international development. Regrettably, our federal Treasurer, Wayne Swan, did not support the tax at the G20 finance meeting in 2009 possibly because Australia came through the global financial crisis relatively unscathed. But how will we fare in future crises?

They say the only certain things in life are Death and Taxes. The tedious Tax Pack booklet may be a great cure for insomnia but let’s make it a relic. Let’s push for proper tax reform and stop fiddling at the edges while Australia burns...or, should I say, floods.

 
 (Reprinted with permission - Thank you, Michelle!).